Evaluation Over the Implementation of the No-Smoking Policy in Pariaman City Transportation Office: A Qualitative Study

  • Dhea Synthia Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
  • Tri Krianto Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
Keywords: No Smoking Area, Evaluation, Regulation

Abstract

Introduction: The Pariaman City Government has tried to reduce the number of smokers and the number of people exposed to cigarette smoke by issuing several policies, one of which is the policy regarding the No Smoking Area (KTR) which is contained in the Pariaman City Regional Regulation Number 9 of 2017 concerning No Smoking Areas. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the implementation of the No Smoking Area at the Office of the Transportation Agency of Pariaman City.

Methods: This research uses a qualitative study, with data collection through in-depth interviews and observations with an evaluation study design. The informants of this study were 7 people, namely 2 from the Health Office of Pariaman City and 5 from the Transportation Office of Pariaman City, taken using purposive sampling method.

Results: The result of this study is that the implementation of the implementation of the No Smoking Area (KTR) at the Pariaman City Transportation Office is still not going well. As there are still employees who smoke in the room, there has been uneven socialisation and monitoring from the Health Office for KTR at the Pariaman City Transportation Office, to the lack of strict sanctions for those who violate the rules in the No Smoking Area (KTR).

Conclusion: In conclusion, our study contributes to evaluating implementation of No Smoking Area (KTR) at the Pariaman city Transportation Office. This research provides insights into the implementation of No Smoking Area (KTR) is still not good enough, so it’s necessary to improve the monitoring and evaluation of this program in the the Pariaman city Transportation Office. Future studies should expand the scope of the research site so that it can describe boarder conditions, which in turn will advancing knowledge in the field of health.

References

World Health Organization. Mortality and Global Health Estimate [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates/ghe-leading-causes-of-death

WHO. Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) Indonesia Report 2021 [Internet]. World Health Organization. Country Office for Indonesia; 2023. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/378343

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Persentase Penduduk Usia 15 Tahun Ke Atas yang Merokok dalam Sebulan Terakhir Menurut Kabupaten/Kota dan Kelompok Umur di Provinsi Sumatera Barat [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://sumbar.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/3/ZGxsdU15dEtNWEpNYmpCSUsyVkdaRnBpVkV0dVFUMDkjMw==/persentase-penduduk-usia-15-tahun-ke-atas-yang-merokok-dalam-sebulan-terakhir-menurut-kabupaten-kota-dan-kelompok-umur-di-provinsi-sumatera-barat--2023.html?year=2021

Qudus H, Hadi EN. Overview of the Implementation of the No Smoking Area (KTR) Policy in the Indonesian Campus Environment: Literature Review. J Soc Res. 2023;2(6):1916–28.

Sufri S, Nurhasanah N, Ahsan A, Saputra I, Jannah M, Yeni CM, et al. Barriers and opportunities for improving smoke-free area implementation in Banda Aceh city, Indonesia: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2023;13(12):1–13.

Siregar PA. Monitoring and Evaluation of Smoke Free Policy in Medan City: Case Study of Medan City. J Ilm Permas J Ilm STIKES Kendal. 2023;13(1):67–76.

McMeekin N, Wu O, Boyd KA, Brown A, Tweed EJ, Best C, et al. Implementation of a national smoke-free prison policy: An economic evaluation within the Tobacco in Prisons (TIPs) study. Tob Control. 2023;32(6):701–8.

Rasmussen SKB, Lidegaard LL, Pisinger C, Johnsen NF, Kristiansen M. Implementation fidelity of a smoke-free workplace intervention in a private medical company: A mixed-methods process evaluation. Tob Prev Cessat. 2023;9(May):1–13.

Al-Jayyousi G, Kurdi R, Alsaei S, Al-Kaabi H, Alrushdi A, Abdul Rahim H. Students’ perceptions of a university ‘No Smoking’ policy and barriers to implementation: a cross- sectional study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(6).

Nagasawa T, Saito J, Odawara M, Kaji Y, Yuwaki K, Imamura H, et al. Smoking cessation interventions and implementations across multiple settings in Japan: a scoping review and supplemental survey. Implement Sci Commun [Internet]. 2023;4(1):1–20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-023-00517-0

Jia X, Wang R, Qiu X, Huang Y, Wang Y, Jia X, et al. Factors associated with secondhand smoke exposure among non-smoking employees in the workplace: A cross-sectional study in Qingdao, China. PLoS One [Internet]. 2022;17(8 August):1–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263801

Noviana N, Maulana AZ, Nisa LS. The Role of Government in Enforcing Smoking Policies in The Workplace: A Case Study. Partners Univers Int Res J. 2022;1(3):20–5.

Published
2025-01-18
How to Cite
Dhea Synthia, & Tri Krianto. (2025). Evaluation Over the Implementation of the No-Smoking Policy in Pariaman City Transportation Office: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 7(1), 212~218. https://doi.org/10.56338/ijhess.v7i1.6791
Section
Articles