History and Policy Challenges for Counter Radicalization Policy in Central Sulawesi
Abstract
Central Sulawesi is one of the former conflict areas and terrorism bases in Indonesia. The government continues to prevent the community especially the youth community from becoming radicalized. This research aims to find the right policy to prevent terrorism in the future. The data analysis technique used is Soft System Methodology (SSM). The method used is descriptive qualitative, by conducting interviews with the government, community and non-profit organizations. The research findings showed that the Integrated Action Plan program for Managing Social Conflict in the Poso Regency implemented dominated by a military sience 15 years ago but unable to prevent radicalization. A deliberative approach must be used to handle long-term radicalization, involving non-governmental actors as policy agents. The deliberative approach used the power of social capital, discussions with the citizen and involving the community in decision-making.
References
[2] Neumann, P. (2013). The Trouble with Radicalization.Journal International Affairs. pp. 873-893.
[3] Mardiyanta, Antun. (2011) Kebijakan Publik Deliberatif: Relevansi dan Tantangan lmplementasinya. Jurnal Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik, 24 (3). pp. 261-271. ISSN p-ISSN: 2086-7050; e-ISSN: 2528-601
[4] Abritaningrum, Y. T. (2016). Proses Deliberatif dalam Pembuatan Keputusan untuk Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik (Kasus Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik dengan Partisipasi Masyarakat di Puskesmas di Kota Yogyakarta). Master’s Thesis, notpublished, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
[5] Kontras.(2004)
[6] Aditjondro, George Junus. (2004). Kerusuhan Poso dan Morowali, Akar Permasalahan dan Jalan Keluarnya. Penerapan Keadaan Darurat di Aceh, Papua, dan Poso Dalam Pemilu 2004. Jakarta: ProPatria.
[7] Cinu, Surahman (2016). Agama, Militerisasi dan Konflik, Kasusu Poso Sulawesi Tengah, Al-Fikra Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman Volume 5 No. 1, 2016.
[8] Asrori, Ahmad. (2015). Radikalisme Di Indonesia: Antara Historisitas dan Antropisitas, Kalam: Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam, Volume 9, No. 2, December, p. 261)
[9] Mbai. (2014).
[10] Holdo, Markus. (2020). An Inclusive And Participatory Approach To Counter Radicalization? Examining The Role Of Muslim Associations In The Swedish Policy Process. Journal Ethnicities
[11] Hayward. (2000).
[12] Lindekilde, L. (2014) Refocusing Danish counter-radicalization efforts: An analysis of the(problematic) logic and practice of individual de-radicalization interventions. In: Baker- Beall C, Heath-Kelly C and Jarvis L (eds), Counter-Radicalisation: Critical Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 223–241.
[13] Ragazzi F. (2014). Policed multiculturalism? The impact of counter-terrorism and counter-radicalization and the ‘end’ of multiculturalism. In Baker-Beall C, Heath-Kelly C and Jarvis L (eds) Counter-Radicalisation: Critical Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 170–188.
[14] Thomas P, Grossman M, Miah S, et al. (2017) Community reporting thresholds: Sharing information with authorities concerning violent extremist activity and involvement in foreign conflict: A UK replication study. Research Report. Lancaster: CREST (Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats).
Copyright (c) 2025 Roma Tressa, Nur Faizah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
