Legal Certainty on Business Dispute Resolution Through Arbitration
Abstract
Arbitration has increasingly become the preferred method for resolving business disputes, offering an alternative to the often lengthy and complex litigation process. It presents several advantages, such as expedited proceedings, confidentiality, and final, binding decisions. This article explores how legal certainty is upheld within the arbitration process and evaluates its effectiveness in resolving commercial disputes in Indonesia. The research adopts a normative juridical method, utilizing qualitative analysis of legislation, legal doctrines, and case studies of arbitration awards. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s arbitration framework, governed by Law No. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, provides a solid legal foundation for arbitration proceedings. The final and non-appealable nature of arbitration decisions enhances legal certainty for the disputing parties. Nevertheless, challenges remain in the enforcement phase, particularly in the execution of arbitral awards through the district courts. These issues highlight the need for better coordination between arbitration institutions and the judiciary, along with improved legal awareness among law enforcement officials regarding the role of arbitration. In conclusion, arbitration continues to play a vital role in ensuring legal certainty and promoting the efficient resolution of business disputes in today’s legal landscape.
References
Anwar, M. (2022). Green economy sebagai strategi dalam menangani masalah ekonomi dan multilateral. Jurnal Pajak Dan Keuangan Negara (PKN), 4(1S), 343-56.
Arrizal, N. Z. (2020, June). Perlindungan Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Penjaga Muruah Bangsa Indonesia. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Unhamzah (pp. 65-77).
Baharuddin, M. Y. A. (2024). Peran Hukum Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Nasional: Hukum Arbitrase. Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan, 5(2), 310-320.
Bianti, G. (2023). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Arbitrase Internasional yang Berpotensi Menghambat Kegiatan Investasi Asing di Indonesia. Crepido, 5(1), 64-78.
Born, G. B. (2020). International commercial arbitration.
Hukumonline.com. (2023, Juni 8). Alasan di balik arbitrase asing jadi pilihan pelaku bisnis. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/alasan-di-balik-arbitrase-asing-jadi-pilihan-pelaku-bisnis-lt6481e4700ee9e/.
Manullang, F. M. (2019). Kritik terhadap struktur ilmu hukum menurut Paul Scholten. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 49(1), 44-56.
Rahayu, D. P., SH, M., & Ke, S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media.
Rifa’i, I. J., Purwoto, A., Ramadhani, M., Rusydi, M. T., Harahap, N. K., Mardiyanto, I., ... & Surasa, A. (2023). Metodologi penelitian hukum. Sada Kurnia Pustaka.
Sri Warjiyati, S. H. (2018). Memahami dasar Ilmu Hukum: konsep dasar ilmu hukum. Prenada Media.
Sulaiman, A. (2019). Pengantar ilmu hukum.
Tan, D. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum: Mengupas dan mengulas metodologi dalam menyelenggarakan penelitian hukum. Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 8(8), 2463-2478.
Taolin, F. T., Mujiburohman, D. A., & Widarbo, K. (2024). Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat dalam Pendaftaran Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah. Tunas Agraria, 7(1), 68-85.
Wagianto, W. (2020). Penegakan Hukum Melalui Arbitrase Syariah.
Yanti, N., & Marpaung, D. S. H. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek PS Glow Melawan MS Glow Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(18), 540-550.
Copyright (c) 2025 Christina Bagenda, Anindya Bidasari, Purwanto, Bambag Teguh Handoyo, Rustam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
