Reformulation Of Punishment Objectives In The National Criminal Code: A Restorative Justice Perspective

  • Yohanes Pande Universitas Flores
  • Bustomi Universitas Dharma Indonesia
  • Eko Budi Sariyono Universitas Wahid Hasyim Semarang
  • Ade Ari Gumilar Universitas Mayasari Bakti Kota Tasikmalaya
  • Stelvia W. Noya Universitas Pattimura
Keywords: Sentencing Reformulation, National Criminal Code, Restorative Justice, Social Reconciliation, Rehabilitation.

Abstract

This article examines the reformulation of sentencing objectives under the Indonesian National Criminal Code as regulated in Law Number 1 of 2023 by positioning restorative justice as its central analytical framework. The enactment of the new Criminal Code represents a response to long-standing critiques of the conventional punitive paradigm, which has largely been dominated by retributive and retaliatory approaches. Such a model is considered insufficient in addressing the needs of victims, restoring disrupted social relations, and promoting the rehabilitation of offenders. Consequently, the integration of restorative justice values into the objectives of sentencing constitutes a strategic effort to establish a more humane and equitable criminal justice system. This study employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The analysis focuses on provisions governing sentencing objectives within the National Criminal Code and evaluates their alignment with the principles of restorative justice as developed in contemporary criminal law discourse. Data were collected through library research, encompassing legislation, legal doctrines, and national scholarly journal articles addressing criminal law reform and restorative justice. The findings indicate that the National Criminal Code has incorporated a significant shift in sentencing objectives, moving beyond punishment-oriented models toward victim recovery, offender rehabilitation, and the preservation of social balance and harmony. Nevertheless, the practical implementation of restorative justice based sentencing objectives continues to face substantial challenges, particularly with regard to the readiness of law enforcement authorities, prevailing legal culture, and the need for more detailed and operational implementing regulations. Therefore, the reformulation of sentencing objectives within the National Criminal Code requires strengthened implementation policies to ensure that restorative justice principles are effectively realized in criminal justice practice.

 

References

Akbar, M. F. (2021). Keadilan Restoratif dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana sebagai Perwujudan Nilai-Nilai Pancasila. Justitia Et Pax, 37(1).
Arafat, M. (2025). Paradigma pemidanaan baru dalam KUHP 2023: Alternatif sanksi dan transformasi sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 33-46.
Awaluddin, S. (2024). Keadilan Restoratif: Konsep Dan Pengaturannya Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia, 1(1), 24-42.
Irawati, A. C. (2019). Politik hukum dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana (RUU KUHP asas legalitas). ADIL Indonesia Journal, 1(2).
Muksin, M. R. S. (2023). Tujuan Pemidanaan dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Sapientia Et Virtus, 8(1), 225-247.
Mulyadi, D. L., & Sh, M. H. (2023). Bunga rampai hukum pidana, perspektif, teoretis dan praktik. Penerbit Alumni.
Nasution, M. I., Ali, M., & Lubis, F. (2024). Pembaruan Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia: Kajian Literatur atas KUHP Baru. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 5(01), 16-23.
Nuroini, I. (2024). Efektivitas penerapan restorative justice dalam kasus pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika ISSN 2721-4796 (online), 5(2), 818-828.
Pramita, S. A. (2025). Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Penologi Modern: Alternatif Pemidanaan Di Era Reformasi Hukum. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik| E-ISSN: 3031-8882, 2(2), 899-912.
Rizkia, N. D., & Fardiansyah, H. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Normatif dan Empiris). Penerbit Widina.
Sahyana, Y. (2020). Implementasi Pemenuhan Dan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Konstituen, 2(2), 75-87.
Sakti, I. (2024). Penerapan prinsip keadilan restoratif atas tindak pidana yang mengakibatkan kematian terhadap korban: Mungkinkah keadilan restoratif dapat diterapkan dalam tindak pidana yang mengakibatkan kematian. Jurnal Darma Agung, 32(5), 11-33.
Salsabila, S., & Wahyudi, S. T. (2022). Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menggunakan Pendekatan Restorative Justice. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(1), 61-70.
Setiawan, M. N., & Afita, C. O. Y. (2025). Reformasi Sistem Hukum Pidana Melalui Kuhp Baru: Tantangan Dan Peluang Menuju Keadilan Sosial. Jurnal Hukum Das Sollen, 11(1), 79-94.
Widjaja, G. (2024). Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Studi Kasus: Putusan PN Makassar Nomor. 1/Pid. Sus-AM/2022/PN. Mks). Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara, 1(2), 926-938.
Wulandari, L., & Maulana, K. (2025). Kajian Yuridis terhadap Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Peradilan Tindak Pidana Ringan dan Kaitannya dengan Pemenuhan Keadilan Sosial. MUARA HUKUM: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum & Administrasi Publik, 1(1), 12-19.
Wulandari, S. (2023). Reintegrasi Sosial Dalam Sistem Pemasyarakatan Sebagai Visi Pemidanaan Dalam Hukum Nasional. In Seminar Nasional Teknologi Dan Multidisiplin Ilmu (SEMNASTEKMU) (Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 26-36).
Published
2026-01-08
How to Cite
Yohanes Pande, Bustomi, Eko Budi Sariyono, Ade Ari Gumilar, & Stelvia W. Noya. (2026). Reformulation Of Punishment Objectives In The National Criminal Code: A Restorative Justice Perspective . International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 8(1), 506~511. https://doi.org/10.56338/ijhess.v8i1.9959
Section
Articles