Programmatic Assessment in Medical Education: A Bibliometric and Narrative Review of Its Potential Contributions to Health Literacy and Health Promotion Competencies

  • N Juni Triastuti Doctoral Study Program of Medical and Health Science, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia. Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Tri Nur Kristina Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Titi Savitri Prihatiningsih Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Programmatic Assessment, Medical Education, Bibliometric, Narrative Review, Health Literacy, Health Promotion

Abstract

Introduction: Programmatic assessment (PA) has emerged as a transformative framework in medical education, emphasizing longitudinal evaluation, meaningful feedback, and data-informed decision-making to enhance learner development. Its role extends beyond competency measurement, contributing to broader educational goals such as strengthening health literacy and health promotion competencies—core attributes for future healthcare professionals. This bibliometric and narrative review aimed to map global research trends, influential contributors, and thematic patterns in programmatic assessment while synthesizing evidence on its potential to advance health literacy and health promotion competencies in medical education.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in Scopus database for articles published between 1977 and 2025. Inclusion criteria of eligible studies were those addressing programmatic assessment in medical or health professions education—including portfolios, decision processes, or programmatic feedback—and explicitly linking these approaches to health literacy or health promotion competencies. The dataset comprised 822 records and a final sample of 166 publications eligible for bibliometric analysis. Bibliometric indicators were analysed using VOSviewer, including publication trends, author networks, organizational and country contributions, and keyword co-occurrence. Narrative synthesis integrated empirical findings on PA implementation and its educational outcomes.

Results: A total of 1092 authors, 502 organizations, and 44 countries contributed to 1737 indexed keywords, of which 167 met inclusion thresholds. Thematic clustering identified four dominant domains: feedback and learning analytics, competency-based assessment, digital and AI-supported assessment, and professional identity formation. Recent literature emphasizes PA’s capacity to cultivate reflective practice, communication skills, and health advocacy—key components of health literacy and promotion.

Conclusion: Programmatic assessment represents an integrative and evidence-driven approach that not only enhances learning and assessment quality but also fosters essential competencies in health literacy and promotion, aligning medical education with 21st-century public health priorities.

References

Schut S, Driessen, E., & Heeneman, S. Factors influencing the success of programmatic assessment: A scoping review. Medical Teacher, 43(2), 125–132. (2021).

Heeneman S, Schut, S., & Driessen, E. . Programmatic assessment: From assessment to learning. GMS Journal for Medical Education, 37(1), Doc19. (2020). .

Heeneman S, de Jong LH, Dawson LJ, Wilkinson TJ, Ryan A, Tait GR, et al. Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment–1. Agreement on the principles. Medical Teacher. 2021;43(10):1139-48.

Torre D, Rice NE, Ryan A, Bok H, Dawson LJ, Bierer B, et al. Ottawa 2020 consensus statements for programmatic assessment–2. Implementation and practice. Medical Teacher. 2021;43(10):1149-60.

Baartman L, van Schilt-Mol T, van der Vleuten C. Programmatic assessment design choices in nine programs in higher education. Frontiers in Education. 2022;7.

Govaerts M, Van der Vleuten C, Schut S. Implementation of Programmatic Assessment: Challenges and Lessons Learned. Education Sciences. 2022;12(10).

Roberts C, et al. Student perspectives on programmatic assessment in a large medical programme: A critical realist analysis. . Medical Education (2022). ;https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14807.

Tsai HY, Lee, S.–Y. D., Coleman, C., Sørensen, K., et al. Health literacy competency requirements for health professionals: A Delphi consensus study in Taiwan. BMC Medical Education. (2024);24, Article 209. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05198-4.

Stone M, Bazaldua, O., & Morrow, J. Developing health literacy communication practices for medical students. MedEdPORTAL,. (2021). ;Article 11091. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11091.

Magzoub ME. Going beyond competencies: Building blocks for a patient-centred medical curriculum. Medical Teacher, (2024). ;46(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2412786. .

Blackford K, et al. A preliminary analysis of ‘Passport to practice’: approaches to assessing health promotion competencies in undergraduate curricula. Health Promotion International,. (2024). ; 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/17579759241230065.

Torre D, Daniel M, Ratcliffe T, Durning SJ, Holmboe E, Schuwirth L. Programmatic Assessment of Clinical Reasoning: New Opportunities to Meet an Ongoing Challenge. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2024.

Car J, Ong, Q. C., Erlikh Fox, T., et al. The Digital Health Competencies in Medical Education Framework: An international consensus statement based on a Delphi study. JAMA Network Open,. (2025). ; 8(1), e2453131. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53131.

Dearnley C, Haigh, J., & Fairhall, J. Using mobile technologies for assessment and learning in practice settings: a case study. . Nurse Education in Practice, (2008). ; 8(3), 197-204.

Pelaccia T VR. Motivation in medical education. . Med Teach. 2017 39(2):136-140. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1248924. Epub 2016 Nov 21. PMID: 27866457.

Donthu N, Kumar, S., & Mukherjee, D. A bibliometric analysis of the global research on COVID-19. Journal of Business Research, . (2021). ; 124, 249-261.

Donthu N, Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., et al. . How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. (2021). ;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.

Schut S, Maggio LA, Heeneman S, van Tartwijk J, van der Vleuten C, Driessen E. Where the rubber meets the road - An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education. Perspect Med Educ. 2021;10(1):6-13.

Govaerts M, van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Holmboe, E. S. . Beyond assessment of learning: Exploring the role of programmatic assessment in fostering trust, learning and feedback culture. Medical Teacher, . (2023). ;45(4), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2107858.

Govaerts MJ, & Tavares, W. Assessment for learning: Key tensions and future research. Medical Education, 54(1), 92–100. (2020). .

Baartman LKJ, & Prins, F. J. Triangulation of assessment data and feedback loops in competence portfolios. Adv Health Sci Educ (2021). ;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-100xx.

Schut S, Driessen, E., van Tartwijk, J., van der Vleuten, C., & Heeneman, S. Programmatic assessment: From assessment to learning. Medical Teacher, (2020). ;42(7), 800–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1708298.

Pedlow M. The key role of feedback in institutional readiness for programmatic assessment. . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education/Medical Education (2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2025.2564775.

Greenfield J, & Qua, K. “It changed how I think”—Impact of programmatic assessment upon practicing physicians: A qualitative study. . Perspectives on Medical Education,. (2023). ;12(4), 301–310. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10403454/ PMC.

Greenfield J, Collin, L., & Smith, R. . Impact of programmatic assessment upon practising clinicians and learners: longitudinal insights. Perspectives on Medical Education, (2023). ;12, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-023-00700-2.

Tandilangi TP, Rekawati, E., & Eriska, W. Improving Functional Status of Older Adults Through Health Literacy Media: A Systematic Review. Jurnal Berita Ilmu Keperawatan,. (2024) 17(2), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.23917/bik.v17i2.5063.

Ozturk FO A-AS. Health Literacy and Health Promotion Behaviors of Adolescents in Turkey. Journal of pediatric nursing. 2020 54:e31-e35. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.04.019. Epub 2020 May 20. PMID: 32446664.

Kusumaningrum T. Ky, Indriawan T., Widya M., Saputri, Pebrianti S., Liswanti A.,. Formation of Peer Educators in Information Dissemination Efforts to Prevent HIV Risky Behavior in Students,. Warta LPM. 2021, ;24:677. https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/warta/article/view/15035.

Herawati E, & Utami, L. Internet Addiction Causes Problems Emotional And Behavior In Adolescents. Biomedika 14(1), 74-80. (2022). ;DOI: 10.23917/biomedika.v14i1.17126.

Nurdiyanto F.A. HEP. The hidden impacts: Identifying psychological burdens during the Covid-19 pandemic,. Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 7:130. 2022, ;DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/indigenous.v7i2.17472.

Published
2026-02-02
How to Cite
Triastuti, N. J., Tri Nur Kristina, & Titi Savitri Prihatiningsih. (2026). Programmatic Assessment in Medical Education: A Bibliometric and Narrative Review of Its Potential Contributions to Health Literacy and Health Promotion Competencies. Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia (MPPKI), 9(2), 403-419. https://doi.org/10.56338/mppki.v9i2.8789